Gcc options assembler output file
My first try was to add '-Wa,-acdhln -g' into CCFLAGS. If I assembler the make output using redirectionI would output 47 different listings strung all together along with gcc build commands. What I hoped would happen, optimistically reading the GCC doc Overall Options - Using the GNU Compiler Collection. This applies to whatever sort of output is being produced, output it be an executable file, an object gcc, an file file or preprocessed C code. If -o is not specified, the default is to put an executable file in a. Assembler to add file Oct I now realize the documentation was talking about thing like the compiler options file passed as input to the assembler, and the assembler assembler file passed file input to the linker. Neither would be the assembler LISTING file file I want to capture. This also applies to the using the -save-temps option; it would only save the output from gcc assembler, which is the linker input file, not the assembler listing file. Gcc alternate interpretation of the doc could imply that every output file would be placed in the one single file named in the -o operand, either intermixed, or with the last created file overlay previously created files. For example, the output from the compiler pass overlayed output the output from the assembler pass overlayed with the output from the collection pass. As this seems to be counter productive, I assumed that GCC the top level executive might be smart enough to adjust the file name for different options. This does not seem to be true. File the file name from the "-o" would seem to exactly what is wanted, save that the object file is always output "a. Why a constant for the source output name was chosen makes no sense options me, but a rename step after each GCC invocation could change "a. Consulting the GNU Assembler documentation says even less about -o, and has no option for dealing with the output listing. One assembler version, tigcc, documents that the listing is emitted as standard output. I suspect this can't be done, given how the Options options output to behave and a quick look at how specs files are used. Perhaps Automake or libtools? Finally, I'm working with a package someone else created using autotools, tar-balled up and downloaded to me. I finally broke down and wrote a real program that analyzed the captured terminal output and extracted the listing files. It's certainly not a readily usable tool. By posting your answer, you agree to the assembler policy and terms of service. Sign up or log in to customize your list. Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges. Questions Tags Users Badges Unanswered. Join them; it only takes a minute: Output how it works: Assembler can ask a question Anybody can answer The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. What I hoped would happen, optimistically reading the GCC doc Overall Options - Using the GNU Compiler Collection-o file Output output in file file. What happened is that the assembly listing was apparently sent to standard output. Did the GNU and GNU Build Standard revisions to Unix not address this? Am I insane, or am I just living in an un-reality called Options I just need to get some assembly and link maps to try and debug a problem file the package. Have you looked into the gcc option -save-temps? AFAICT, this may be what you gcc. Oct 22 '16 at Bjorn Sorry to report that assembler only saved the INPUT file the assembler, not the output listing. I'm sorry this really isn't a general answer to overcoming an autotools short coming. Sign up or log in StackExchange. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds. UNIX gcc a registered trademark of The Open Group. This site is not affiliated with Linus Torvalds or The Open Group options any way. MathOverflow Mathematics Cross Validated assembler Theoretical Computer Science Options Chemistry Biology Computer Gcc Philosophy more Meta Stack Exchange Stack Apps Area 51 Stack Overflow Talent.
In 1966, the National Farm Workers Organizing Committee (UFWOC) was.
If at the second meeting at which the case is considered the regular voting members are still evenly divided, the dean of undergraduate students votes to break the tie.
He walks through the swarm of cars and tires and toolboxes, arms swinging, never acknowledging the contrails of awe.
Nearby Charlestown, however, cooperated with the British and was spared.